BREAKING: Congress Makes Massive Move Against Hillary – She’s Facing 5 Years In Prison

AUTHOR

August 16, 2016 6:14pm PST

Millions of Americans know that Hillary Clinton committed perjury when she testified before Congress. Now, two different U.S. House committee chairmen are fighting back and exposing her lies in four separate situations.

In a letter from House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform chairman Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) and House Judiciary Committee chairman Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) to U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Channing Phillips, the House Republicans lay out their argument as to how Clinton perjured herself.

Here’s the letter Chaffetz and Goodlatte wrote to Phillips, courtesy of The Political Insider:

On August 2, 2016, Assistant Attorney General Peter Kadzik confirmed that you received the Committees’ request for an investigation regarding certain statements made by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton during her testimony before Congress and will ‘take appropriate action as necessary. To assist the investigation, this letter identifies several pieces of Secretary Clinton’s testimony that appear to implicate 18 U.S.C. §§1621 and 1001 the criminal statutes that prohibit perjury and false statements, respectively. The evidence collected by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) during its investigation of Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal email system during her time as Secretary of State appears to directly contradict several aspects of her sworn testimony, which are described in greater detail below.

Before detailing at least four specific instances in which Clinton allegedly committed perjury, the House Republicans explained the matter a bit further:

During a House Select Committee on Benghazi hearing on October 22, 2015, Secretary Clinton testified with respect to (1) whether she sent or received emails that were marked classified at the time; (2) whether her attorneys reviewed each of the emails on her personal email system; (3) whether there was one, or more servers that stored work-related emails during her time as Secretary of State; and (4) whether she provided all her work-related emails to the Department of State. Although there may be other aspects of Secretary Clinton’s sworn testimony that are at odds with the FBI’s findings, her testimony in those four areas bears specific scrutiny in light of the facts and evidence FBI Director James Comey described in his public statement on July 5, 2016 and in testimony before the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on July 7, 2016.

The Republicans argued that Clinton perjured herself when she explained in sworn testimony that she never sent or received emails on her illicit email server. America’s national security was put at major risk thanks to what the FBI called her “extreme carelessness.”

It may not be as difficult to put Clinton behind bars as many people think. Steven Pomerantz, a retired assistant FBI director who worked for the bureau for 28 years, said that a perjury review is generally straightforward for agents.

“They look at the transcript of the testimony they provided in light of what they know to be, suspect to be the truth. They investigate both sides and take the aggregate and turn it over to the prosecuting authority for a decision,” Pomerantz said, according to Fox News. “Since the Director (Comey) already established what she (Clinton) said and the investigation is complete, it would be a relatively simple matter to make a decision about perjury… given the history of this, it’s hard to say – it would seem to me a matter of weeks not months in this case.”

SHARE this story if you think Hillary Clinton should be in PRISON!

comments

You must login in order to leave a comment.